The AI Architect

The AI Architect

Share this post

The AI Architect
The AI Architect
73 hours → 7 minutes with one Claude trick

73 hours → 7 minutes with one Claude trick

The commands that are the difference between 73-hour struggles and 7-minute solutions

Tyler Folkman's avatar
Tyler Folkman
Jun 29, 2025
∙ Paid
4

Share this post

The AI Architect
The AI Architect
73 hours → 7 minutes with one Claude trick
1
1
Share

Join 4,867 developers saving $500+/month with these exact workflows. And get new tips that no one else is talking about that will save your hours each week.


I'll admit something embarrassing. I'm lazy.

Not "won't do the work" lazy. But "why type the same thing 50 times" lazy.

For months, I'd debug by pasting error messages into Claude with some variation of "fix this." Sometimes I'd get fancy: "plan how to debug this, ultra think, give me confidence in your solution."

It worked. About 70% of the time.

Then I discovered slash commands. Now I just type /debug-code [error] and get solutions 90% of the time on the first try.

The difference? My debug command is dozens of lines of refined instructions I'd never type manually. Because, you know. Lazy.

The realization that changed how I use AI

Here's what kills me about AI tools. We all know better prompts get better results.

But who's going to type a 40-line prompt every time they debug?

Nobody. We're human. We take shortcuts.

That's where I was stuck. I knew exactly what to tell Claude for better debugging results. I'd spent hours perfecting prompts.

But when I hit an actual bug at 4 PM on a Thursday?

"fix this plz"

Slash commands solved my laziness problem. Now my best prompts are always one command away.

Try this right now (takes 2 minutes)

Here's the simplest command that changed how I code:

Create .claude/commands/explain.md:

Explain this code like I'm smart but lazy:
- Skip the obvious stuff
- Focus on the tricky bits
- Tell me what could break
- One-line summary at the end

Next time you're reviewing code, type /explain instead of "explain this code."

The difference shocked me. Actual insights. No fluff.

Why I was wrong about "better prompts"

Everyone preaches "write better prompts!" That's like saying "eat healthier!" while you're staring at a vending machine at 2 AM.

The real problem isn't knowing what makes a good prompt. It's actually using that knowledge when you need it most.

I had a notebook full of "perfect prompts." Never used them. Too much friction.

Slash commands removed the friction. My laziness finally had a solution.

But the /explain command is just the beginning...

How I went from 70% to 90% debugging success

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The AI Architect to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Tyler Folkman
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share